Reviewer

All submitted research papers shall be gone under double-blind peer review process.

Online Submission System:

It is advised to all contributors that they should submit their original articles by using the online submission link. In case of any difficulty, they can send their papers using email: support@Abhijournals.org . Ensure that author identities are hidden in the manuscript itself.

Review Process:

Upon submission, the editorial team will review the anonymized manuscripts for completeness and adherence to the journal's guidelines. The editor assigns manuscripts to reviewers without revealing author identities.

Review and Recommendation:

Reviewers provide their assessments and recommendations based on the content of the manuscript. They submit their recommendations to the editor through a secure online system or via email without revealing their identities to the authors.

Editorial Decision:

As per the policy of Abhi International Journals, the editor makes a final decision regarding the manuscript based on the reviews. Authors receive feedback from the reviewers and the editor without knowing the reviewers' identities.

Author Revisions:

If revisions are required, authors are guided to make revisions to their manuscript without knowing the reviewers' identities.

Editorial Transparency:

Abhi International Journals is committed to maintaining transparency by ensuring the confidentiality of both authors and reviewers. Only the editorial team and relevant staff have access to this information.

Publication:

Once a manuscript is accepted by Abhi International Journals, author identities shall be revealed in the final published version.

Ongoing Monitoring:

Abhi International Journals continuously monitors the double-blind review process to ensure that it remains effective and fair, and makes adjustments as needed.

Reviewer Guidelines:

Abhi International Journals works hard to promote scientific understanding and knowledge, and the credibility of published articles is entirely dependent on an effective and thorough peer review process. Reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts and make suggestions to ensure they meet scientific standards within the defined timeframe.

  • Confirm availability after receiving the review invitation.
  • Approve or decline the invitation; optionally recommend a colleague.
  • Notify the editorial office if the manuscript is outside your expertise.
  • Inform the editorial office in case of time constraints or conflicts of interest.
  • Review manuscripts objectively and without bias.
  • Complete evaluations within the given timeframe.
  • Do not contact authors directly during blind review.
  • Do not use manuscript content for personal gain.
  • Provide respectful, professional, and non-offensive feedback.
  • Ensure comments are free from discrimination based on race, religion, nationality, gender, or other factors.
  • Interested reviewers may send their CV and publication details to the journal.

Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed

Ain Shams University, Egypt

Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak

Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology

Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal

University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma

NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India

Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay

Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Budapest, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin

University of Antwerp, Belgium

Prof. (Dr.) Anurag Mishra

NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India