Peer Review Process

The Abhi International Journals upholds a rigorous and transparent peer-review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and impactful research. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial board to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that meet these criteria are forwarded for double-blind peer review, where the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential. This process ensures unbiased and constructive feedback, maintaining the integrity of the evaluation.

Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts with domain-specific expertise. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on parameters such as the clarity of objectives, soundness of methodology, quality of analysis, validity of results, significance of conclusions, and the overall contribution to the field. Reviewers also provide recommendations for improvement, which may include addressing methodological issues, clarifying arguments, or expanding discussions.

The editorial board considers the reviewers' feedback and makes one of four decisions: acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection. Authors are informed promptly and provided with detailed feedback to guide their revisions, if required. Revised manuscripts may undergo additional rounds of review to ensure all concerns are adequately addressed.

The journal emphasizes ethical practices in peer review, requiring reviewers to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to maintain strict confidentiality regarding the manuscript and its content. The process is designed to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity, ensuring that only manuscripts of exceptional quality are accepted for publication.

By maintaining a robust peer-review system, Abhi International Journals strives to foster trust, credibility, and excellence in academic publishing, supporting the dissemination of reliable and impactful research.