Reviewer
Double-Blind Peer Review Process
All submitted research papers undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring complete anonymity of both authors and reviewers.
Online Submission System
Authors are advised to submit original manuscripts via the online submission system. In case of difficulty, submissions may be sent to support@Abhijournals.org. Author identities must be removed from the manuscript file.
Review Process
The editorial team evaluates anonymized manuscripts for completeness and adherence to journal guidelines before assigning them to reviewers.
Review & Recommendation
Reviewers assess manuscripts objectively and submit recommendations through secure channels without revealing their identities.
Editorial Decision
The editor makes the final decision based on reviewer reports. Authors receive consolidated feedback while reviewer identities remain confidential.
Author Revisions
When revisions are requested, authors revise manuscripts without knowledge of reviewer identities.
Editorial Transparency
Abhi International Journals ensures confidentiality of all parties. Access to identity information is restricted to the editorial team only.
Publication
Upon acceptance, author identities are revealed in the final published article.
Ongoing Monitoring
The double-blind review process is continuously monitored to maintain fairness, integrity, and effectiveness.
Reviewer Guidelines
Abhi International Journals promotes scientific excellence through a rigorous peer-review system. Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining academic quality and integrity.
- Confirm availability within the specified review timeframe.
- Accept or decline review invitations promptly; suggest alternatives if needed.
- Review manuscripts only within your area of expertise.
- Declare conflicts of interest or time constraints immediately.
- Maintain objectivity and avoid bias during evaluation.
- Complete reviews within the assigned timeline.
- Maintain confidentiality; do not contact authors directly.
- Do not use manuscript content for personal gain.
- Provide respectful, constructive, and professional feedback.
- Ensure reviews are free from discrimination based on race, gender, nationality, or beliefs.
- Interested reviewers may submit their CV and publication details to the journal.
Editorial & Reviewer Board
Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed
Ain Shams University, Egypt
Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India
Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma
NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay
John von Neumann University, Hungary
Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Prof. (Dr.) Anurag Mishra
NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Arun Saxena
St John’s College, Mumbai, India
Prof. (Dr.) Csaba Bálint Illés
John von Neumann University, Hungary
Prof. (Dr.) Dejan Mircetic
University of Novi Sad, Serbia
Prof. (Dr.) Deepa Parasar
Amity University Mumbai, India
Prof. (Dr.) Devendra Kumar
University of Technology & Applied Sciences, Oman
Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Haitham ISA Alqahtani
University of Technology, Bahrain
Prof. (Dr.) Harish Kumar
NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Helena Fidlerova
Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia