Reviewer

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

All submitted research papers shall undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the evaluation.

Online Submission System

Contributors are advised to submit their original articles using the online submission link. In case of any difficulty, manuscripts may be sent via email at support@Abhijournals.org. Authors must ensure that all identifying information is removed from the manuscript.

Review Process

Upon submission, the editorial team reviews anonymized manuscripts for completeness and compliance with journal guidelines. Manuscripts are then assigned to reviewers without revealing author identities.

Review and Recommendation

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on scholarly content and submit their recommendations to the editor through a secure system or email, while maintaining anonymity.

Editorial Decision

The editor makes the final decision based on reviewers’ reports. Authors receive feedback without disclosure of reviewer identities.

Author Revisions

If revisions are required, authors are guided to update their manuscripts without knowledge of reviewer identities.

Editorial Transparency

Abhi International Journals ensures strict confidentiality of both authors and reviewers. Access to identifying information is limited to the editorial team only.

Publication

Once a manuscript is accepted, author identities are revealed in the final published version.

Ongoing Monitoring

The journal continuously monitors the double-blind review process to maintain fairness, effectiveness, and integrity.

Reviewer Guidelines

Abhi International Journals is committed to advancing scientific understanding through a rigorous peer-review process. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the credibility and quality of published research.

Guidelines for Reviewers
  • Confirm availability to complete the review within the specified timeframe.
  • Accept or decline the invitation promptly; recommend alternative reviewers if unable to review.
  • Ensure the manuscript aligns with your area of expertise.
  • Declare any conflict of interest or time constraints to the editorial office.
  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively, avoiding bias or partiality.
  • Complete reviews within the assigned timeframe.
  • Notify the editorial office if the manuscript is outside the journal’s scope.
  • Maintain confidentiality and do not contact authors directly.
  • Do not use manuscript content for personal gain.
  • Provide constructive, respectful, and professional feedback.
  • Ensure that race, religion, nationality, gender, or political factors do not influence reviews.
  • Interested reviewers may submit their CV and publication details to the journal.

Editorial & Reviewer Board

Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed
Ain Shams University, Egypt

Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak
Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology

Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma
NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India

Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay
Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin
University of Antwerp, Belgium

Prof. (Dr.) Anurag Mishra
NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India

Prof. (Dr.) Arun Saxena
St John’s College of Engineering and Management, Mumbai, India

Prof. (Dr.) Csaba Bálint Illés
Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Dejan Mircetic
University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Prof. (Dr.) Deepa Parasar
Amity University Mumbai, India

Prof. (Dr.) Devendra Kumar
University of Technology and Applied Sciences–Shinas, Oman

Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Haitham ISA Alqahtani
University of Technology, Bahrain

Prof. (Dr.) Harish Kumar
NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India

Prof. (Dr.) Helena Fidlerova
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia